心理追凶

从讲台到被告席：30岁女老师与2名男学生恋爱生下女孩，面临6项重罪指控_我的网站

无证之罪

一 | "Remember what happened in 1983? Two days after 241 Marines were blown up in Lebanon, the USA invaded tiny Grenada. Overnight, the previous headlines disappeared. I think we are seeing the same today. NATO is losing badly in Ukraine and it’s going to be a long winter for the West. Pounding its imperial chest with Taiwan is now what the MSM is reporting, much less so Ukraine," suggests Jeff J. Brown, author of "The China Trilogy," editor at China Rising Radio Sinoland, and curator of the Bioweapon Truth Commission.,If Pelosi travels to Taiwan, this would be the first time a high-ranking US politician visits the place in 25 years. Last time it was Newt Gingrich, then-speaker of the US House of Representatives, who arrived on the island in 1997, ignoring the Chinese leadership's discontent.,"I said firmly, 'We want you to understand, we will defend Taiwan. Period,'" Gingrich told the press at the time, as quoted by The New York Times. However, Clinton administration officials made it clear that Gingrich "was speaking for himself.",Likewise, it appears that Pelosi's apparent visit to Taiwan is not in line with the Biden administration's China policy, argues Francesco Sisci, a Beijing-based China expert, author, and columnist.,"American politics is not set like an omniscient Leviathan," the China expert says. "The Congress, the Senate, the executive all move according to different agendas which do not often coincide and are in conflict with one another. The issue is that there is a growing anti-Beijing sentiment in America and this has sometimes bursts which aren’t fully sorted out. I believe the visit is an expression of a sentiment, rather than of a clear cut plan.",According to CNN, Pelosi's initiative has triggered concerns both in the Biden administration and the Pentagon, with US national security officials "quietly working to convince House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of the risks of her potential trip to Taiwan." While in 1997 Beijing and Washington managed to solve the dilemma, this time the PRC leadership might opt for a harsher response, CNN and The Guardian have warned.,US Military Expansion in Asia-Pacific is Part of Plan to Take on Russo-China Tandem, Scholar Says28 July, 16:15 GMT,Washington has been fanning US-Sino tensions for quite a while, starting with Donald Trump's tariff war against Beijing, which has yet to be halted by Joe Biden. In a candid phone conversation, Chinese President Xi Jinping warned his American counterpart against "playing with fire" over Taiwan and explained that any involvement would ultimately backfire on the US.,"A Chinese general has publicly declared that Pelosi’s visit could entail a military response from Beijing," Brown says. "China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has repeated this. Now, with Xi’s 'You get burned playing with fire' metaphor, I think there would be a military response.",Senior Colonel Tan Kefei, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Defense, stated on July 26: "If the US insists on taking its own course, the Chinese military will never sit idly by, and it will definitely take strong actions to thwart any external force's interference.",Tan highlighted that Pelosi's visit to Taiwan would "seriously violate the one-China principle" and "seriously harm China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and seriously damage the political foundation of China-US relations.",Meanwhile, Brown surmises that China's hypothetical response "might include a declared no-fly zone." However, there is a "much more elegant option," according to the author:,"[China could] take over Taiwan’s Kinmen Island, which is only two kilometers from Xiamen, off China’s Fujian Province coast. It would take only a few hours. I do not think Beijing will strike any US targets, unless attacked first.",North Korea Ready to Mobilize Nuclear Deterrence Forces at Any Moment - Kim Jong Un28 July, 01:13 GMT,The scholar also does not rule out that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's (DPRK) remark, made earlier this week, that Pyongyang is “fully prepared” for any military conflict with the United States is no coincidence.,"Does Biden know that China and nuclear-armed North Korea have had a mutual defense treaty since 1961?" Brown asks rhetorically. "NATO is being bled dry in Ukraine and it is imperial folly, hubris or geopolitical brinkmanship to think it can fight East Asia’s biggest and most powerful military, which is only 200 km from Taiwan.",For his part, Sisci believes that the PRC could opt for an asymmetrical non-military response. Still, the unfolding crisis is complicated by the fact that Washington is already involved in a confrontation with Russia, raising questions as to whether the US is capable of taking on Moscow and Beijing at once.,"I don’t think that either China or the US wants an escalation," says Sisci. "The talk between Biden and Xi Jinping was to avoid an escalation.",Brown also believes that Beijing's warnings have been heard by Washington.,"Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan has been bandied about by Washington for months now," he says. "A supposed Covid-19 infection scuttled the first trial balloon. After Biden’s phone call yesterday with Xi, I suspect another American 'postponement' is likely to occur. If not, then 'Katy, bar the door!'"。

随着英国曼彻斯特皇家法院的审判进入最后阶段，30岁的丽贝卡·乔恩斯面临着与两名未成年男生发生性行为的六项重罪指控，她对此均表示不认罪。此案围绕一位前教师与青少年之间的关系展开，陪审团周五将进行审议，决定其命运。

二 |

在过去数日的法庭审理中，陪审员们深入了解了这位教师的心理状况及据称与青少年发生的多起性接触事件，证据与辩词交织，引人深思。尤其引人注目的是，乔恩斯与第二名所谓的受害者，即未公开身份的男孩B，育有一女。

情感纠葛与信物。陪审团得知，乔恩斯曾向一名青少年寄送了一封充满激情的情书，称其为“我所梦想的一切”。检察官Joe Olman在庭上朗读了这封信的部分内容，信中乔恩斯表达了对16岁男孩B的深情：“你的每一寸都是完美，你是我所有愿望的实现。”乔恩斯承认，尽管她与男孩B发展了感情并在其离校后怀上了他的孩子，但她否认在其就读高中期间与其有染。

男孩B则声称，两人在他尚为小学生时便已发生关系，且描述了包括亲吻在内的亲密互动。此外，双方还因未出生孩子的未来产生争执，乔恩斯被指威胁称若男孩B结束关系，她将自残甚至自杀，让孩子成为他的责任。

社交媒体的秘密交流。

三 | 乔恩斯承认通过Snapchat与15岁的男孩A秘密沟通，而这一行为及其与男孩B的类似交流均瞒着双方家长。男孩们与她之间存在明显的暧昧，如男孩A称呼她为“性感”，而男孩B的信息内容则更为露骨。乔恩斯在庭上坦承，作为专业教师，她不应涉足此类交流，对此她负有责任。

奢侈礼物与约会之夜。法庭透露，乔恩斯赠予男孩A一条价值345英镑的Gucci腰带，并被监控录像捕捉到与他在特拉福德中心购买该物品的画面，检方视此为“诱骗”行为的一部分。此外，她还策划了一场包含性暗示刮刮卡、玫瑰花瓣和隐藏字条的“约会之夜”与男孩B共度，最终以宣布怀孕的消息作为“惊喜”，这一系列行为突显了双方关系的复杂与不当。

失去一切的代价。乔恩斯在庭上哭泣着讲述自己刚出生的女儿在24小时内被带走的经历，她每周仅有三次、每次三小时的探访权。她身着粉色婴儿帽出现在法庭，以此象征对孩子的思念，否认此举是为了博取陪审团同情，强调这是她与女儿情感联系的一种方式。

案件中的细节，如乔恩斯在性行为前的警告语、与男孩们的相互吸引以及她对自己孤独渴望关注的心理状态的揭示，共同构建了一个复杂的情感与法律责任交织的故事。